D1.3 Mutation and gene editing. Practice questions with markscheme.
45 original IB-style questions on D1.3, written from the 2025 guide: 19 multiple-choice, 17 short-answer, 5 data-based, 2 extended-response part, 2 drawing. Below is a 21-mark standard-level practice paper built from them, ready to hand out as a class quiz or homework, or to sit yourself and mark against the scheme. Print it, project it, or build a fresh one on the same topic.
What the guide asks for
7 statements at SL and HL, 3 additional higher level.
- D1.3.1SL / HL Gene mutations as structural changes to genes at the molecular level
- D1.3.2SL / HL Consequences of base substitutions
- D1.3.3SL / HL Consequences of insertions and deletions
- D1.3.4SL / HL Causes of gene mutation
- D1.3.5SL / HL Randomness in mutation
- D1.3.6SL / HL Consequences of mutation in germ cells and somatic cells
- D1.3.7SL / HL Mutation as a source of genetic variation
- D1.3.8HL Gene knockout as a technique for investigating the function of a gene by changing it to make it inoperative
- D1.3.9HL Use of the CRISPR sequences and the enzyme Cas9 in gene editing
- D1.3.10HL Hypotheses to account for conserved or highly conserved sequences in genes
In the bank for D1.3
- 19 multiple-choice
- 17 short-answer
- 5 data-based
- 2 extended-response part
- 2 drawing
- 15 higher level only
Every question is original and tagged to a guide statement. See the whole bank →
Make your own
The practice paper
Paper code: this paper was generated, so the code is its recipe. Enter it at biologybybradford.com/exam-maker to rebuild this exact paper and its markscheme.
A single-base substitution changes a codon from GAG to GTG in the gene for the β-chain of haemoglobin, replacing glutamic acid with valine. What kind of consequence does this illustrate?
- The loss of an entire chromosome pair
- A silent mutation with no effect
- A change only in mRNA processing
- A missense change altering the protein
Why do insertions or deletions of a single base within a coding sequence usually have more drastic effects than substitutions?
- They shift the reading frame downstream
- They cannot be transcribed at all
- They change more chromosomes at once
- They always create a stop codon at once
A worker in a radiography department receives a small dose of ionizing radiation to the whole body over many years.
Part of the mRNA transcribed from a normal allele reads AUG CAU UGG ACA GAA, coding for Met-His-Trp-Thr-Glu. Three mutant alleles of the same gene were sequenced. In mutant 1 the fourth codon reads ACG instead of ACA. In mutant 2 the third codon reads UGA instead of UGG. In mutant 3 the first base of the fourth codon has been deleted, so the sequence reads AUG CAU UGG CAG AA... Both ACA and ACG code for threonine (Thr); CAG codes for glutamine (Gln); UAA, UAG and UGA are stop codons.
New chemicals are often screened for mutagenicity by exposing large numbers of bacteria to them and counting the mutant colonies that result. Evaluate the usefulness of such bacterial tests for predicting whether a chemical would cause mutations in humans.
The base sequence of part of the sense strand of a gene is ATG CCA GTT AAG. Draw three diagrams to show this sequence after a base substitution, after a base insertion and after a base deletion, labelling each type of mutation and marking the position of the change.
Original practice questions © Biology by Bradford · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 · Not affiliated with or endorsed by the International Baccalaureate Organization.
Rebuild or edit this exact paper (and its markscheme): biologybybradford.com/exam-maker?code=BbB-EAAAAABAABQAO8PA
Show the markscheme
Markscheme BbB-EAAAAABAABQAO8PA
One mark per point; / separates alternative wording within a point, OR separates alternative answers, words in brackets are not required, underlined words are essential. OWTTE = or words to that effect.
- D: the classic sickle-cell substitution: one amino-acid change alters haemoglobin's behaviour (aggregation, sickling of red cells);
- A: frameshift: all subsequent codons are read differently (often producing a premature stop), whereas a substitution changes at most one codon;
- (a) [1]
- a gamete / a cell that gives rise to gametes (germ-line cell) in the ovary or testis;
Do not accept 'sex cell' alone.
- (b) [2 max]
- a lung cell is a body (somatic) cell, and mitosis passes the mutation only to its daughter cells within that tissue;
- an accumulation of such mutations in a cell can lead to uncontrolled division, i.e. a tumour;
- somatic cells do not contribute DNA to gametes, so the mutation cannot be passed to the next generation, OWTTE;
- (c) [2]
- the risk depends on the cumulative dose, because mutations accumulate and are not repaired away between exposures;
- the dose from a single shift is too small to measure reliably or to relate to risk, so totalling it over weeks gives a usable measure, OWTTE;
- (a) [1]
- a (base) substitution;
Accept 'silent/synonymous substitution'.
- (b) [2]
- only the third base of the codon has changed, and both ACA and ACG code for threonine;
- the genetic code is degenerate, so the amino acid sequence, and therefore the protein, is unchanged, OWTTE;
- (c) [2]
- the codon UGG (Trp) has become UGA, a stop codon, so translation ends early (nonsense mutation);
- only a very short truncated polypeptide is made, which cannot fold correctly and is non-functional, OWTTE;
- (d) [2 max]
- removing one base shifts the reading frame, so every codon after the mutation is read differently;
- the whole of the rest of the amino acid sequence is therefore changed, and a stop codon often appears early;
- a substitution alters at most one amino acid and may alter none, so far less of the protein is affected, OWTTE;
- strength: DNA (structure/replication) is universal, so a chemical that damages bacterial DNA is likely to damage human DNA by the same chemistry;
- strength: bacteria allow huge numbers, rapid generations and easy counting, so the test is fast, cheap and quantitative (a dose–response can be measured) and avoids testing on animals/humans;
- limitation: bacteria lack human metabolism, a chemical may only become mutagenic (or be detoxified) after processing by liver enzymes, so results can be false negatives/positives (unless liver extract is added);
- limitation: uptake, DNA repair and exposure levels differ between bacteria and human tissues, and mutagenicity in bacteria does not prove the chemical causes cancer/disease in humans;
- judgement: a valuable first screen for identifying probable mutagens, but positive/negative results must be confirmed with further (mammalian-cell or epidemiological) evidence, OWTTE;
NOS: evaluating an experimental model system; require at least one strength, one limitation and a judgement.
- substitution: a sequence of the same length (12 bases) in which one base has been replaced by a different base, e.g. ATG CCA GTC AAG, labelled and with the changed base marked;
- insertion: a sequence one base longer (13 bases) in which an extra base has been added between two of the original bases, e.g. ATG CCA GTT TAA G, labelled and with the added base marked;
- deletion: a sequence one base shorter (11 bases) from which one original base has been removed, e.g. ATG CCA GTA AG, labelled and with the position marked;
- triplets after the insertion or deletion shown regrouped to indicate the shift in the reading frame, OWTTE;
Any base may be changed, added or removed; credit only if all the other bases are unchanged and in the original order. Do not accept the insertion or deletion of a whole triplet as the example. Award [3 max].
More in Theme D · Continuity and change
- D1.1 DNA replication 45
- D1.2 Protein synthesis 48
- D2.1 Cell and nuclear division 46
- D2.2 Gene expression 45
- D2.3 Water potential 47
- D3.1 Reproduction 53
- D3.2 Inheritance 76
- D3.3 Homeostasis 45
- D4.1 Natural selection 46
- D4.2 Stability and change 45
- D4.3 Climate change 46
All 40 IB Biology subtopics → · AP Biology units → · Open the exam maker →