Biology  by Bradford
support
IB Biology 2025 · Theme A · Unity and diversity

A4.1 Evolution and speciation. Practice questions with markscheme.

67 original IB-style questions on A4.1, written from the 2025 guide: 31 multiple-choice, 25 short-answer, 6 data-based, 2 extended-response parts, 2 drawing, 1 labelling. Below are two ready-made practice papers built from them, one at standard level (21 marks) and one at higher level (20 marks); switch between them above the paper. Hand one out as a class quiz or homework, or sit it yourself and mark against the scheme. Print it, project it, or build a fresh one on the same topic.

What the guide asks for

7 statements at SL and HL, 4 additional higher level.

  1. A4.1.1SL / HL Evolution as change in the heritable characteristics of a population
  2. A4.1.2SL / HL Evidence for evolution from base sequences in DNA or RNA and amino acid sequences in proteins
  3. A4.1.3SL / HL Evidence for evolution from selective breeding of domesticated animals and crop plants
  4. A4.1.4SL / HL Evidence for evolution from homologous structures
  5. A4.1.5SL / HL Convergent evolution as the origin of analogous structures
  6. A4.1.6SL / HL Speciation by splitting of pre-existing species
  7. A4.1.7SL / HL Roles of reproductive isolation and differential selection in speciation
  8. A4.1.8HL Differences and similarities between sympatric and allopatric speciation
  9. A4.1.9HL Adaptive radiation as a source of biodiversity
  10. A4.1.10HL Barriers to hybridization and sterility of interspecific hybrids as mechanisms for of preventing the mixing of alleles between species
  11. A4.1.11HL Abrupt speciation in plants by hybridization and polyploidy

In the bank for A4.1

  • 31 multiple-choice
  • 25 short-answer
  • 6 data-based
  • 2 extended-response parts
  • 2 drawing
  • 1 labelling
  • 28 higher level only

Every question is original and tagged to a guide statement. See the whole bank →

Make your own

The practice paper

21 marks at SL · 20 at HL · each has its own code
Take it online → Build a fresh paper Paper code BbB-EACAAAAAABQAOite
Biology · topic quiz
Standard level · topic practice, not an exam format
30 minutes21 marks

Paper code: this paper was generated, so the code is its recipe. Enter it at biologybybradford.com/exam-maker to rebuild this exact paper and its markscheme.

Covers A4.1 Evolution and speciation · SL
Name:
1.

The diagram compares the forelimb bones of four mammals. What do these limbs provide evidence for?

[1]
human armbat wingwhale flipperhorse foreleghumerusradius and ulnacarpalsmetacarpal and phalangesForelimb skeletons of four mammals, not drawn to the same scale
  1. Convergent evolution, because the limbs carry out different functions
  2. Common ancestry, because the same bones occur in the same arrangement
  3. Analogous structures produced by the same selection pressures
  4. Structures that evolved independently in each of the four groups
2.

Seeds were collected from a lowland population (200 m above sea level) and an alpine population (2300 m) of one species of meadow plant. Seedlings from both populations were then grown side by side for one season in a garden at 200 m. The table shows the mean height and the mean density of hairs on the leaves of wild plants at the sites where the seeds were collected, and of the plants grown in the garden (40 plants in each group).

PopulationHeight of wild plants / cmHeight of garden plants / cmLeaf hairs of wild plants / hairs mm⁻²Leaf hairs of garden plants / hairs mm⁻²
Lowland646155
Alpine17582322
(a)Deduce, with a reason, whether the difference in height between the wild lowland plants and the wild alpine plants is mainly heritable.[2]
(b)Deduce, with a reason, whether these data show that the alpine population has evolved to differ from the lowland population.[2]
(c)Suggest how the difference in leaf hair density between the two populations could have arisen.[2]
3.

Explain how comparisons of the base sequences of DNA from different species provide evidence for evolution.

[3]
4.

Pythons are snakes with no external legs, but inside the body near the base of the tail each python has a small pelvis and a short thigh bone (femur), ending in a tiny claw that shows outside the skin. Lizards with legs have a pelvis and femur in the same position. The slow worm (Anguis fragilis) is a lizard that also has no legs. A student wrote three statements.
Statement 1: "The ancestors of snakes burrowed underground and stopped using their back legs, so the legs of each snake shrank during its life and its young were born with smaller legs."
Statement 2: "The python's femur cannot be homologous with a lizard's femur, because the python does not use it for walking."
Statement 3: "Slow worms and snakes have both lost their legs, so slow worms must be more closely related to snakes than to any lizard with legs."

(a)Explain the error in statement 1 and give a correct account of how leg size decreased in the ancestors of snakes.[3]
(b)Explain the error in statement 2.[2]
(c)Explain the error in statement 3 and outline evidence that could test which group slow worms are most closely related to.[2]
5.

Bonobos (Pan paniscus) are found only south of the Congo River and common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) only north and east of it. Explain how these two species could have arisen from one ancestral population.

[4]

Original practice questions © Biology by Bradford · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 · Not affiliated with or endorsed by the International Baccalaureate Organization.
Rebuild or edit this exact paper (and its markscheme): biologybybradford.com/exam-maker?code=BbB-EACAAAAAABQAOite

Show the markscheme

Markscheme BbB-EACAAAAAABQAOite

One mark per point; / separates alternative wording within a point, OR separates alternative answers, words in brackets are not required, underlined words are essential. OWTTE = or words to that effect.

1. A4.1.4 [1]
  • B: the bones correspond one to one in the same arrangement despite serving different functions, which is best explained by inheritance from a common ancestor with a pentadactyl limb;
2. A4.1.1
  • (a) [2]
    • not (mainly) heritable / mainly caused by the environment (at the alpine site);
    • when grown in the same conditions the two populations reach similar heights / 61 cm and 58 cm;
    • the difference falls from 47 cm in the wild to 3 cm in the garden;

    The conclusion alone does not score: it must be supported by the garden data.

  • (b) [2]
    • yes, in leaf hair density (but not in height);
    • the difference in leaf hairs remains when both are grown in the same conditions / 22 and 5 hairs mm⁻² in the garden;
    • so the difference in leaf hairs is heritable/genetic, and evolution is a change in the heritable characteristics of a population;
    • the height difference disappears in the garden, so it is acquired/not heritable and is not evidence of evolution;
  • (c) [2]
    • dense leaf hairs are an advantage at high altitude, e.g. reducing water loss in wind / insulating against cold / shading from strong (UV) light;
    • plants in the alpine population varied in (heritable) leaf hair density;
    • plants with more hairs survived and reproduced more at the alpine site / selection favoured dense hairs;
    • the trait was passed to offspring and became more common over many generations;

    Accept any plausible advantage of hairy leaves at altitude for the first point.

3. A4.1.2 [3 max]
  • mutations cause base sequences to change / differences to accumulate over time (at a roughly steady rate);
  • the more (sequence) differences between two species, the longer since they diverged from a common ancestor / the more distantly related they are;
  • sequence similarities shared by all organisms indicate common ancestry / descent with modification;
  • the pattern of differences can be used to construct evolutionary trees, which can be checked against other evidence (e.g. anatomy/fossils), OWTTE;
4. A4.1.1, A4.1.2, A4.1.4, A4.1.5
  • (a) [3]
    • changes acquired during an organism's life (such as shrinking from disuse) are not heritable / are not passed to offspring;
    • there was heritable variation in leg size in the ancestral population (arising by mutation);
    • in burrows, individuals with smaller legs survived and reproduced more (e.g. because legs hindered movement or cost resources to grow);
    • so the heritable characteristic of smaller legs became more common and leg size fell over many generations;
    • evolution is change in the heritable characteristics of a population, not change in an individual, OWTTE;
  • (b) [2]
    • homology depends on shared origin / inheritance from a common ancestor, not on function;
    • the python's femur has the same position and relationship to the pelvis as a lizard's femur, so both were inherited from a common ancestor with legs;
    • homologous structures can be modified by natural selection for different functions or (almost) none, OWTTE;
  • (c) [2]
    • leg loss could have evolved independently in the two lineages / by convergent evolution;
    • similar selection pressures (e.g. burrowing or moving through dense vegetation) can produce similar features in distantly related groups, so one shared feature is not reliable evidence of close relationship;
    • compare base sequences of DNA (or amino acid sequences of proteins) of slow worms, snakes and lizards with legs: the fewest differences show the most recent common ancestor;

    Award one mark for the error (first or second point) and one for the evidence (third point): an answer that only explains the error scores 1.

5. A4.1.6-A4.1.7 [4 max]
  • an ancestral population was split by the Congo River into two populations on opposite sides;
  • neither ape can swim, so the river acts as a geographical barrier and gene flow between the two populations stopped;
  • conditions differed on the two sides of the river (e.g. gorillas compete for ground vegetation north of the river but are absent south of it), so the populations faced different selection pressures;
  • differential selection favoured different heritable characteristics in each population, e.g. less aggressive, female-led groups in bonobos but more aggressive, male-dominated groups in chimpanzees;
  • (so) genetic differences accumulated and the populations diverged over many generations;
  • eventually the populations became different enough to be separate species, OWTTE;

Accept other correct differences between the two species or their habitats for mp 3 and 4. Award any 4.

More in Theme A · Unity and diversity

All 40 IB Biology subtopics →  ·  Command terms →  ·  AP Biology units →  ·  Open the exam maker →